Floyd

Michael Devin Floyd v. Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20253:24-cv-01278California4,438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 24-cv-01278-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

v. IN LIMINE

SABER FITNESS HEGENBERGER, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 149 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michael Devin Floyd, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint for civil rights violations and contract claims against Defendant Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC (“Saber”), alleging that Saber improperly terminated Floyd’s gym membership. ECF No. 52 (Third Amended Complaint). The case is set to proceed to a bench trial on January 12, 2026. ECF No. 135. Pending before the Court are fourteen motions in limine from Floyd. ECF No. 149. The Court heard oral argument at the parties’ pretrial conference on November 13, 2025. Having considered the parties’ arguments, the Court rules as follows.1 II. BACKGROUND The facts of this case are well known to the parties, and the Court has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.