Auld
Richard Gosztyla v. Auld, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD GOSZTYLA, No. 2:22-cv-01276-KJM-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AULD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. §1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 5, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court adopts the findings and recommendations in part, to the extent they grant defendants’ motion for summary 27 …