Wellington

Wellington v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 202524-3162California531 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MONICA WELLINGTON; DAVID No. 24-3162 WELLINGTON, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-05683-MEMF-

AFM

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT

SERVICES, LLC; MARGARET

LAKE; MTGLQ INVESTORS,

LP; ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Monica and David Wellington appeal pro se from the district court’s order

dismissing their action alleging federal and state law claims related to a foreclosure

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judgment in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.