Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 202524-3801California438 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUKHVINDER SINGH; et al., No. 24-3801 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A246-604-263

A246-604-264

v.

A246-604-265

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Sukhvinder Singh and his family, natives and citizens of India, petition pro

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming

without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application

for asylum and denying Singh’s applications for withholding of removal and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.