Singh
Singh v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 202524-3801California438 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 14 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SUKHVINDER SINGH; et al., No. 24-3801 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A246-604-263
A246-604-264
v.
A246-604-265
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 12, 2025**
Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Sukhvinder Singh and his family, natives and citizens of India, petition pro
se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming
without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application
for asylum and denying Singh’s applications for withholding of removal and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have…