Palomo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONATHAN PALOMO, No. 24-2181 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:20-cv-08969-FMO-AGR v.

MEMORANDUM*

BEST BUY STORES, LP; DAMIEN

PADA; FADI AMMOURI,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Jonathan Palomo appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

confirming an arbitration award in favor of Best Buy and other defendants in

Palomo’s action alleging employment-related claims. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Monster Energy Co. v. City Beverages,

LLC, 940 F.3d 1130,…