Lujano-Orozco

Lujano-Orozco v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 202521-26California252 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NICOLAS LUJANO-OROZCO, No. 21-26 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-924-464 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Nicolas Lujano-Orozco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). whether the agency erred in applying the exceptional and extremely unusual

hardship standard to a given…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.