People v. Roach CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 14, 2025C101787California1,360 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/14/25 P. v. Roach CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C101787

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 21F3507, 22F2056 & 22F0999) v.

CLINTON ANTOINE ROACH,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Clinton Antoine Roach asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Finding none, we will affirm.

BACKGROUND1

In March 2021, Redding police officers executed a search warrant at a residence associated with defendant. During the search, defendant was found with a metal can

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.