Stuart Robinson v. City of Seattle

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 202524-4357California368 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BARBARA A. STUART ROBINSON, No. 24-4357 D.C. No. 2:24-cv-01004-RSL Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF SEATTLE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Barbara A. Stuart Robinson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action concerning the Seattle police department’s failure to respond

to her call. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Lake

v. Ohana Mil. Cmtys., LLC, 14 F.4th 993, 1000 (9th Cir. 2021) (dismissal for lack

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of subject matter jurisdiction); Watison v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.