Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Dist. v. Dept. of Water Resources

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 14, 2025C101878MCalifornia8,403 words

Opinion

Opinion

background.

On page 12, first full paragraph, delete “preconstruction” throughout the paragraph so that the paragraph now reads:

In December 2023, DWR certified the project’s final EIR and approved the project. Although the final EIR’s Executive Summary section described the project as “consist[ing] of the construction, operation, and maintenance” of the above-described “water diversion and conveyance facilities,” the Project Description section included additional geotechnical work that was similar in nature to the initial geotechnical work

2 covered by the IS/MND and subsequent addenda. The geotechnical work set forth in the final EIR included the following:

On page 13, last paragraph, delete the first sentence beginning with “As mentioned” and replace with the following:

As mentioned, the geotechnical work relevant to this appeal would be carried out prior to construction of the project.

On page 14, second full paragraph under subsection D, fifth sentence, delete “the preconstruction” so that the sentence now reads:

They also filed a motion for preliminary injunction, seeking to enjoin DWR from proceeding with geotechnical work “unless and until it complies with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.