Dana Soft Pty Ltd v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20253:25-cv-03821California599 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANA SOFT PTY LTD, Case No. 25-cv-03821-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER INVITING PLAINTIFF TO

v. FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant.

12 On May 1, 2025, Plaintiff Dana Soft Pty Ltd (“Dana”) filed this contract action against Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”). ECF No. 1. Dana asserted that this Court has jurisdiction over its claims based on federal diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Compl. ¶ 7. In its initial Complaint, Dana alleged that it “is an Australian limited liability company with its principal place of business located [in Australia],” and that Meta is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located in California. Id. ¶¶ 1–2. Because Dana failed to include any allegations as to the citizenship of its members and owners, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause on September 9, 2025, ordering Dana to provide information regarding the citizenship of any members or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.