The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. I.C. Refrigeration Service Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20253:25-cv-05508California557 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY Case No. 25-cv-05508-JSC

COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR DEFAULT v. JUDGMENT 10 I.C. REFRIGERATION SERVICE INC., et Re: Dkt. No. 35 al., Defendants. 12 In this insurance coverage declaratory judgment action, Plaintiff insurer Travelers Indemnity (“Travelers”) seeks a judicial declaration it has no duty to defend or indemnify I.C. Refrigeration Service, Inc. or Flory Construction, Inc. (“Flory”) in a state court construction defect action Highbridge Oakland (“Highbridge”) has filed against these two entities (the “Underlying Suit”). By Order filed November 10, 2025, the Court granted Flory’s motion to dismiss Travelers’ claim as to the duty to defend because Travelers could not show the damages Highbridge seeks in the Underlying Suit are not potentially “property damages” covered by the policies at issue (collectively “the Policy”), and failed to establish…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.