Rich-Banales

Sharon S. Chand v. Lori Lynn Rich-Banales, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20252:23-cv-01583California946 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARON S. CHAND, No. 2:23-cv-01583-DC-SCR (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

LORI LYNN RICH-BANALES, et al., (Doc Nos. 5, 15) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 9, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations recommending that the court grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) claims against all Defendants, Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C § 1981 claims against Defendants Jennifer Lynn Crick and Lori Lynn Rich-Banales, Plaintiff’s § 1981 hostile work environment and non-employment-based claims against Defendants Philip J. Bonnet and Alta California Regional Center (“ACRC”), and all claims against Defendant ACRC, Board of Directors. (Doc. No. 15.) The pending findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.