Herrera

Juan Carlos Herrera v. C & J Clark America Inc, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20253:25-cv-07072California3,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUAN CARLOS HERRERA, Case No. 25-cv-07072-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

C & J CLARK AMERICA INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 12 Defendants.

\\ \\ \\ Plaintiff brings this putative class action alleging various wage and hour claims under California state law. (Dkt. No. 1-2.) Plaintiff originally filed this suit in Alameda County Superior Court, then Defendants removed the case to federal court based on the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). (Dkt. No. 1.) Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand. (Dkt. No. 12.) Plaintiff argues Defendants have not met their burden of proving the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million as required by CAFA. After considering the parties’ written submissions, the Court concludes oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. Defendants have met their burden of proving, by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.