Arias

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIMMY YOUNG VANG, Case No. 2:24-cv-1644-DJC-JDP (P) Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT ARIAS, Respondent. 16 On August 18, 2025, the court granted petitioner thirty days to file either an amended petition or notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice in accordance with the undersigned’s March 3, 2025 order. The court specifically warned petitioner that failure to comply with the August 18 order could result in dismissal. Petitioner has not responded to the August 18 order and the time do so has passed. Accordingly, dismissal of the action is warranted. The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); see Local Rule 110 (“Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for…