Grimes

Jerome L. Grimes v. Vitamin Shoppe, Orange, CA; Vitamin Shoppe, Moreno Valley, CA; Vitamin Shoppe, Rancho Cucamonga, CA; Vitamin Shoppe, Covina, CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20253:25-cv-02017California2,138 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JEROME L. GRIMES, Case No.: 3:25-cv-2017-RBM-MSB

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 10 v. (1) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

VITAMIN SHOPPE, Orange, CA; AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) VITAMIN SHOPPE, Moreno Valley, CA; [Doc. 2] AND VITAMIN SHOPPE, Rancho Cucamonga,

CA; VITAMIN SHOPPE, Covina, CA, (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

Defendants. FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Jerome L. Grimes, a detainee at Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility in Riverside County, has filed a pro se Complaint and a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). (Docs. 1–2.) In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges acts of retaliation, fraud and negligence by Defendants. (See Doc. 1.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s IFP motion and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.