Murray

Keyairra A. Murray v. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20254:25-cv-08067California1,133 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEYAIRRA A. MURRAY, Case No. 4:25-cv-08067-KAW

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA

PAUPERIS APPLICATION;

v. SCREENING ORDER REVIEWING

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION, Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 6 11 Defendant. 12 On September 23, 2025, Plaintiff Keyairra A. Murray filed this civil action and application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff’s initial IFP application was denied without prejudice, and she filed an amended IFP application on October 20, 2025. (Dkt. No. 6.) Having considered the application, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court now screens Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and, for the reasons set forth below, concludes that the operative complaint is deficient. I. LEGAL STANDARD The in forma pauperis statute provides that the Court shall dismiss the case if at any time the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.