Ting Duy Nguyen v. Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20252:25-cv-01152California559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TING DUY NGUYEN, No. 2:25-cv-1152 DC AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and paid the filing fee. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On August 11, 2025, the court issued an Order to Show Cause explaining to plaintiff that service on defendant was overdue and had not been properly completed. ECF No. 10 at 1. The undersigned explained how to complete service on an agency of the United States Government and instructed plaintiff to properly complete service no later than September 26, 2025. Id. at 2. Plaintiff responded to the Order to Show Cause on September 2, 2025. ECF No. 11. The response does not address the issue of service. Instead, plaintiff explains that the Secret Service has, for the past six years, been using…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.