Hutton
United States v. Hutton
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2202 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-00158-
MKD-
v.
ROBERT WAYNE HUTTON, OPINION
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Mary K. Dimke, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted August 14, 2025 Anchorage, Alaska
Filed November 17, 2025
Before: Susan P. Graber, John B. Owens, and Ryan D. Nelson, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge R. Nelson; Concurrence by Judge Graber SUMMARY *
Criminal Law
The panel affirmed Robert Hutton’s conviction for sexually exploiting a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Hutton argued that the videos and images of the victim are not “lascivious” under the statutory definition at 28 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(A)(v). The panel held that, as Hutton conceded, this contention is foreclosed by Circuit precedent. The district court, which analyzed the factors set forth in United States v. Dost, 636 F. Supp. 828, 832 (S.D. Cal. 1986), aff’d sub nom. United States v. Wiegand, 812 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1987), did not…