Kelly

Kelly v. Cubesmart

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202523-4017California450 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CYNTHIA RENEE KELLY, No. 23-4017 D.C. No. 4:22-cv-05470-HSG Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CUBESMART; CUBESMART, L.P.;

CUBESMART MANAGEMENT, LLC;

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH,

LLP, Specially Appearing Defendant; JOHANNA TEMPLETON, Specially Appearing Defendant; JESSICA STUART PLINER, Specially Appearing Defendant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Cynthia Renee Kelly appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing for failure to prosecute her diversity action alleging state law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.