Kelemen

Kelemen v. Hamlin

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202524-1906California349 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JASON JOSEPH KELEMEN, No. 24-1906 D.C. No. 6:23-cv-01916-AA Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JOHN HAMLIN; WILLIAM

MARSHALL; EVELYN

CANTENO; MELANIE McMANUS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Oregon state prisoner Jason Joseph Kelemen appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging false

imprisonment in connection with his probation revocation. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Pouncil v. Tilton, 704 F.3d 568, 574

(9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.