Jamie M.D. v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202524-3871California400 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Dr. SHARON JAMIE M.D., an individual, No. 24-3871 D.C. No. 5:23-cv-02070-JGB-SP Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

VETERANS AFFAIRS, a government entity; FARRUKH MERCHANT M.D, an individual,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Sharon Jamie, M.D., appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her

employment action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to serve timely the summons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.