Harper
Harper v. Amur Equipment Finance, Inc
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN HARPER, No. 24-2413 D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01723-YY Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
AMUR EQUIPMENT FINANCE,
INC; WATSON & CHALIN
MANUFACTURING, INC.; ARTISAN
AND TRUCKERS CASUALTY
COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 12, 2025**
Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
John Harper appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
diversity action alleging various claims arising from an incident in which a trailer
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Harper was pulling caught fire in Wyoming. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for…