Williamson-Bess

Williamson-Bess v. United States Postal Service

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202524-5746California270 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEBORAH WILLIAMSON-BESS, No. 24-5746 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-02899-VBF-SHK Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES POSTAL

SERVICE; DAVID P. STEINER,

Postmaster General; MARK

STARKS; EVETT KING; JOHNSON,

Employee; DUMAS, Employee; AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION; WALKER, Plant Manager,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Deborah Williamson-Bess appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action alleging claims under Title VII. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.