Williamson-Bess
Williamson-Bess v. United States Postal Service
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DEBORAH WILLIAMSON-BESS, No. 24-5746 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-02899-VBF-SHK Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES POSTAL
SERVICE; DAVID P. STEINER,
Postmaster General; MARK
STARKS; EVETT KING; JOHNSON,
Employee; DUMAS, Employee; AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION; WALKER, Plant Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 12, 2025**
Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Deborah Williamson-Bess appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing her action alleging claims under Title VII. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de…