Ross

United States v. Ross

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202525-1366California295 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-1366 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:18-cr-00266-WBS-2 v.

MEMORANDUM*

DARRON DIMITRI ROSS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Darron Dimitri Ross appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court agreed with the parties that Ross was eligible for a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). sentence reduction under Amendment 821 to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1. It…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.