Diggs

United States v. Diggs

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202525-2429California393 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-2429 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:11-cr-00265-TSZ-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

HAROLD RAVON DIGGS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Harold Ravon Diggs appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 14-month sentence imposed upon the sixth revocation of his

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Diggs contends that the district court procedurally erred by (1) failing to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). calculate the Guidelines range; (2) failing to discuss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.