Reese

Richmond v. Reese

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202524-1811California387 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND, No. 24-1811 D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00866-HZ Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MICHAEL REESE, Multnomah County Sheriff; STEVEN ALEXANDER;

KURTISS MORRISON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Oregon state prisoner Marshall Charles Richmond appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal

and state law claims arising during his pretrial detention. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Gordon v. County of Orange, 888

F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.