Diaz

Richardson v. Diaz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202524-1247California400 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK L. RICHARDSON, No. 24-1247 D.C. No. 2:20-cv-08030-HDV-JC Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RALPH DIAZ, Secretary and Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, individual and official capacity; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Hernan Diego Vera, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Patrick L. Richardson appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). indifference and retaliation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.