Neal
Neal v. Meink
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202524-2403California524 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ISAIAH NEAL, Nos. 24-1286, 24-2403 D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02281-JAD-NJK Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TROY E. MEINK, Secretary of the Air Force; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF THE AIR FORCE; DAVID S.
CRUIKSHANK; DOUGLAS C.
FITZPATRICK; KYLE KOWALCHUK;
ELIZABETH ANNE MCDUFFIE;
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 12, 2025**
Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Isaiah Neal appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment and
dismissal order in his action alleging Title VII violations arising from his
employment with the Air…