Neal

Neal v. Meink

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202524-2403California524 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISAIAH NEAL, Nos. 24-1286, 24-2403 D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02281-JAD-NJK Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TROY E. MEINK, Secretary of the Air Force; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF THE AIR FORCE; DAVID S.

CRUIKSHANK; DOUGLAS C.

FITZPATRICK; KYLE KOWALCHUK;

ELIZABETH ANNE MCDUFFIE;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Isaiah Neal appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment and

dismissal order in his action alleging Title VII violations arising from his

employment with the Air…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.