Harper

Harper v. Watson & Chalin Manufacturing, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202525-4374California309 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN HARPER, No. 25-4374 D.C. No. 3:25-cv-00435-YY Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

WATSON & CHALIN

MANUFACTURING, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

John Harper appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

diversity action alleging breach of an implied warranty of merchantability. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Because Harper does not challenge the district court’s grounds for dismissal

of his action in his opening brief, we do not consider that decision. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.