Harper
Harper v. Watson & Chalin Manufacturing, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN HARPER, No. 25-4374 D.C. No. 3:25-cv-00435-YY Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
WATSON & CHALIN
MANUFACTURING, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 12, 2025**
Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
John Harper appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
diversity action alleging breach of an implied warranty of merchantability. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Because Harper does not challenge the district court’s grounds for dismissal
of his action in his opening brief, we do not consider that decision. See…