Kazarian

Kazarian v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202525-4427California1,668 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMEN KAZARIAN, No. 25-4427 Agency No. Petitioner,

A249-137-918

v.

ORDER

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

Filed November 18, 2025

Before: Marsha S. Berzon, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges. SUMMARY *

Immigration

In a case in which pro se petitioner Armen Kazarian challenges a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which affirmed the immigration judge’s order of removal, the panel: (1) granted the government’s request for an expedited ruling on Kazarian’s motion to stay removal and granted the stay of removal; (2) granted Kazarian’s motion for appointment of counsel; and (3) denied the government’s motion to dismiss or for summary disposition. The government moved to dismiss Kazarian’s petition for review for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that he did not identify a final order of removal reviewable under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 because his petition misidentified the date of the BIA’s decision. Rejecting that argument, the panel explained that the BIA’s June 17, 2025, decision upheld the IJ’s removal order,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.