Tack

United States v. Tack

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202525-2260California221 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-2260 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 9:24-cr-00060-DWM-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MATTHEW RAY TACK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Matthew Ray Tack appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

his guilty-plea conviction and sentence of five-months’ imprisonment, to be

followed by five years of supervised release, for failure to register as a sex offender

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(b).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Tack’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.