Gordon

United States v. Gordon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202524-2786California263 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2786 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:21-cr-00197-DJC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

LINWOOD HOSEA GORDON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Court, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Linwood Hosea Gordon appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his jury-trial conviction and 24-month sentence for abusive sexual

contact in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(b).

Gordon’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967). Gordon has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.