Obregon

Obregon v. Napier

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202524-350California383 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIO ARMANDO OBREGON, No. 24-350 D.C. No. 4:22-cv-00074-RCC Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MARK NAPIER; LAURA CONOVER;

CHRIS NANOS; BRISENO, Unknown; REYNOLDS, Unknown,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Mario Armando Obregon appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourteenth Amendment violations arising

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). from his pretrial detention. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.