McKinley

McKinley v. Hugie

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202524-4858California358 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERRY McKINLEY, No. 24-4858 D.C. No. 3:15-cv-00228-WQH-BGS Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

B. HUGIE, Correctional Officer,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

AMY MILLER, Warden, J. G. JANDA, Deputy Warden, R. PREMDAS, Correctional Officer,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Former California state prisoner Terry McKinley appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First and

Eighth Amendment claims. We have jurisdiction under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.