Benitez

Benitez v. Phelan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202524-1311California302 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODRIGO BENITEZ, No. 24-1311 D.C. No. 3:23-cv-01242-AGS-BGS Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

JOHN PHELAN, Secretary of the Navy,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Andrew George Schopler, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Rodrigo Benitez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his employment action alleging federal claims. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to

comply with a court order. Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.