Stevenson

United States v. Stevenson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202525-3143California202 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-3143 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:14-cr-00240-DC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

TORIANO STEVENSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dena M. Coggins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Toriano Stevenson appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking

supervised release and imposing a sentence of 4 months’ imprisonment and

months’ supervised release.

Stevenson’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Stevenson has

not filed a pro se…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.