Vahmi

Vahmi v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 18, 2025B331052California4,106 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Kasra Vahmi and Bersadeh Bagheri (together, Appellants) sued Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB (Wilmington) for quiet title of the “right to possess[]” and the “option to purchase” their longtime home in Los Angeles. The trial court sustained Wilmington’s demurrer to the complaint because the issues raised and relief requested were already decided by a prior unlawful detainer judgment Wilmington obtained against Appellants. The court gave Appellants leave to amend to allege causes of action unrelated to the unlawful detainer judgment. After Appellants filed a first amended complaint (FAC) realleging an oral option to purchase the property, the trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend because the FAC continued to allege issues previously decided in the unlawful detainer action. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. The Complaint In July 2022, Appellants filed in propria persona an action for quiet title against Wilmington, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. Appellants alleged they had been tenants of a house on Roscomare Road in Los Angeles since May 2006, after they “temporarily sold” the property to Mia Jeong. Appellants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.