Shochat

Shochat v. Cohen CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 18, 2025B335222California3,824 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 11/18/25 Shochat v. Cohen CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

AMOS SHOCHAT, B335222

Petitioner and (Los Angeles County Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 23STRO00753) v.

YORAM COHEN,

Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gary C. Eto, Judge. Affirmed. Amos Shochat, in pro. per., for Petitioner and Appellant. Westwood Lawyers and Lottie Cohen for Respondent. __________________________

Amos Shochat appeals from an order denying his request for a civil harassment restraining order (CHRO) against Yoram Cohen. Shochat contends the trial court abused its discretion by barring him from calling Yoram’s wife, Lottie Cohen (who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.