Manukyan

Manukyan v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202524-4732California616 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SARKIS MANUKYAN, No. 24-4732 Agency No. Petitioner, A071-043-305 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 13, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and PITTS, District Judge.***

Sarkis Manukyan petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable P. Casey Pitts, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.