Bondi

Cisneros Valdovinos v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202524-5192California979 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAUL CISNEROS VALDOVINOS; No. 24-5192 ISABEL AYALA SANCHEZ; S. C. A.; S. Agency Nos.

C. A., A246-269-482

A246-269-483

Petitioners,

A246-269-484

A246-269-485

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: BOGGS, BRESS, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.***

Saul Cisneros Valdovinos, his wife, and their two children (collectively,

“Cisneros”), natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.