Silao

Silao v. Anderson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 202524-5024California1,142 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN RE: PANDORA HOSPICE CARE, No. 24-5024 INC. D.C. No. 5:23-cv-02050-DOC Debtor

MEMORANDUM*

NICHOLAS SILAO,

Appellant,

v.

KARL T. ANDERSON,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 22, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: R. NELSON and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and COLE, District Judge.**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Douglas R. Cole, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. Appellant Nicholas Silao seeks review of a district court order affirming a

bankruptcy court decision in this turnover action. Specifically, Silao contends that:

(1) the bankruptcy court clearly erred in finding that Silao owed a $137,000 debt to

the debtor, Pandora Hospice Care,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.