Bondi

Ramirez Murillo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 202524-4987California594 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SILVIA RAMIREZ MURILLO; ZET No. 24-4987 PEREZ RAMIREZ; SARAHI PEREZ Agency Nos.

RAMIREZ; NICOLE PEREZ RAMIREZ, A209-167-789

A209-167-790

Petitioners,

A209-167-791

A209-167-792

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: BOGGS, BRESS, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.***

Silvia Ramirez Murillo and three of her children (“petitioners”), natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.