Quezada

Quezada v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 202522-1443California741 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO MARIN QUEZADA, No. 22-1443 Agency No. Petitioner, A207-968-049 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: N.R. SMITH, HURWITZ, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Alejandro Marin Quezada (Marin), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), dismissing

his appeal of the denial of cancellation of removal by an immigration judge (IJ).

The IJ determined that Marin failed to establish “exceptional and extremely

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). unusual hardship” to a qualifying relative required under 8 U.S.C. § 1229(b). We

review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.