Constancio-Morales

Constancio-Morales v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 202523-2163California808 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CECILIO CONSTANCIO-MORALES, No. 23-2163 Agency No. Petitioner, A076-721-168 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and HURWITZ and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Cecilio Constancio-Morales, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an order of an

Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his application for cancellation of removal. We

have jurisdiction under § 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252. See Wilkinson v. Garland, 601 U.S. 209, 217 (2024) (“[T]he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.