Buchanan
Buchanan v. Watkins & Letofsky, LLP
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 202524-6236California2,765 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 20 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMY BUCHANAN, No. 24-6236 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:19-cv-00226-GMN-BNW v.
MEMORANDUM*
WATKINS & LETOFSKY, LLP,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 8, 2025 Las Vegas, Nevada
Before: BENNETT, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BENNETT.
Amy Buchanan appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to
Watkins & Letofsky, LLP on her discrimination and retaliation claims under the
Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. The district
court determined that Watkins & Letofsky was not a covered employer under the
ADA because it did not employ 15 or more employees for 20 or more calendar
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. weeks in 2016 or 2017. We have jurisdiction under 28…