Buchanan

Buchanan v. Watkins & Letofsky, LLP

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 202524-6236California2,765 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMY BUCHANAN, No. 24-6236 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:19-cv-00226-GMN-BNW v.

MEMORANDUM*

WATKINS & LETOFSKY, LLP,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 8, 2025 Las Vegas, Nevada

Before: BENNETT, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BENNETT.

Amy Buchanan appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to

Watkins & Letofsky, LLP on her discrimination and retaliation claims under the

Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. The district

court determined that Watkins & Letofsky was not a covered employer under the

ADA because it did not employ 15 or more employees for 20 or more calendar

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. weeks in 2016 or 2017. We have jurisdiction under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.