Ragland

Ragland v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 20, 2025G063682California4,641 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/20/25 Ragland v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

PAM RAGLAND,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G063682

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2020- 01137118) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee, etc., et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Nick A. Dourbetas, Judge. Affirmed. Motion to augment granted in part and denied in part. Request for judicial notice denied. Pam Ragland, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Womble Bond Dickinson, Kristin Walker-Probst and David A. Berkley for Defendants and Respondents. In her fifth amended complaint, plaintiff Pam Ragland…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.