Birkholz

Robert Parhizgar v. B. Birkholz, Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20252:25-cv-06004California762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-06004-AB-AJR Date: November 14, 2025 Page 1 of

Title: Robert Parhizgar v. B. Birkholz, Warden

DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO UPDATE

ADDRESS OF RECORD

PRESENT:

HONORABLE A. JOEL RICHLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_ Claudia Garcia-Marquez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On July 1, 2025, pro se Petitioner Robert Parhizgar (“Petitioner”), a federal inmate in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) at FCI Lompoc II Satellite Camp (“FCI Lompoc II”), filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (the “Petition”). (Dkt. 1.) On August 6, 2025, Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petition (the “Motion to Dismiss”). (Dkt. 6.) Petitioner filed an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on August 25, 2025. (Dkt. 10.) On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.