Erika Mondragon Gomez v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202516-73532California1,104 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIKA MONDRAGON GOMEZ; JUAN No. 16-73532

PABLO GUTIERREZ MONDRAGON,

Agency Nos. A206-912-005 Petitioners, A206-912-006

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, LEE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Erika Mondragon Gomez (“Mondragon”) and her minor son,

Juan Pablo Gutierrez Mondragon (collectively, “Petitioners”), are citizens of

Mexico. They seek review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision

affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their applications for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). asylum, withholding of removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.