Erika Mondragon Gomez v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202516-73532California1,104 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ERIKA MONDRAGON GOMEZ; JUAN No. 16-73532
PABLO GUTIERREZ MONDRAGON,
Agency Nos. A206-912-005 Petitioners, A206-912-006
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 18, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: BYBEE, LEE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Erika Mondragon Gomez (“Mondragon”) and her minor son,
Juan Pablo Gutierrez Mondragon (collectively, “Petitioners”), are citizens of
Mexico. They seek review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision
affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their applications for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). asylum, withholding of removal, and…