Marriage of Rattan and Prasad CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 2025A172697California1,123 words

Opinion

Opinion

Guez, J.

Filed 11/20/25 Marriage of Rattan and Prasad CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re the Marriage of KOMAL RATTAN and ABHIJIT PRASAD.

KOMAL RATTAN et al, Respondents,

A172697

v. ELANA THIBAULT, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. VF07356209) Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal arises out of Komal Rattan and Abhijit Prasad’s marital dissolution.1 In July 2018, Rattan asked the trial court to disqualify — based on a conflict of interest — and sanction Prasad’s attorney, Elana Thibault. After a two-day hearing, the court disqualified Thibault, struck her pleadings, and imposed $5,000 in sanctions. It ordered Rattan’s counsel to

1 We resolve this case by memorandum opinion. (Cal. Stds. Jud. Admin., § 8.1.) We need…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.