In re Newlen CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 2025F090575California395 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/21/25 In re Newlen CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re F090575

KASEY A. NEWLEN, (Kings Super. Ct. No. 24CM0544)

On Habeas Corpus. OPINION

THE COURT*

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus. Kasey A. Newlen, in pro. per., for Petitioner. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, and Max Feinstat, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. -ooOoo- Petitioner seeks permission to file a belated notice of appeal under the doctrine of constructive filing. (In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 72, 81–82.) The Attorney General was given an opportunity to file an opposition to the request and told that its failure to do so would be treated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.